Showing posts with label architecture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label architecture. Show all posts

Wednesday, 5 October 2011

24 hour economy - Smithfield Market

4am at Smithfield Market

It would be too easy to slip into an analogy of the city as a body when studying sites such as Smithfield.  The stomach of the city.  800 years as the meat centre of London, it still transforms into a thriving hub each night, butchering huge carcasses that arrive (the live cattle used to be driven down the Farringdon Road into the heart of the city for the slaughter), now in refrigerator lorries, and trimming them down to manageable parts to be sold "front of house" in the aisles running axially through the market.  Buyers come direct from their restaurants around London, and further, after they close - purchase the meat and the whole area shuts down again just in time for the commuters to start arriving at 7am.  The blood splattered men in hard hats and welly boots are only disturbed in their work by annoying photographers and trashed clubbers stumbling out of Fabric.









Friday, 30 September 2011

Olympics behind the scenes

I was lucky enough to get a behind the scenes tour of the Olympic Park with the head planner from the Olympic Delivery Authority, and a bunch of planners and reps from major sponsors (me and Joe snuck in around the back)... not quite as impressive as some of the press shots, because access and security limited everything but here are some of the views.
 Above - the power centre, turned out quite nice
 Above  - the media centre, 10 full size film studios over 1m sq ft of space. Unfortunately the elements which distinguish it from a warehouse are the cooling units for all the equipment (below) which will all be removed after the Games as it will be turned into standard office units.

 Above - Berlin, 1947

 The Pringle
 Media Centre from afar
 The centre of the site is taken up with a valley and gardens around the existing route of the River Lea
West Ham?
Blurgh

Wednesday, 7 September 2011

Rosteague, Cornwall


I did a bit too much on this, I should have kept it simpler.  This is Rosteague, a manor in Cornwall over looking the sea.

Tuesday, 6 September 2011

London from up high

One of the best locations to look at London, and not a single other person there... amazing.  Paramount at lunch on a Sunday







Friday, 2 September 2011

'The City in History'... the Romans

Wow, Mumford sort of hates them... he grudgingly acknowledges their technical brilliance at engineering and the manipulation of huge masses - of people, commodities and cultures, but his vitriol for the Roman state and the moral collapse that went with it is aggressive.
The early Roman city was not so different from other conurbations at the time, among the many Greek colonies spread through Italy and the Etruscan settlements they followed.  It was later that the might of the Imperial Empire had spread around the Mediterranean that Rome really developed it uniqueness and originality in the ancient world - the city of the Colosseum and the Circus Maximus.

Rome acted as a huge magnet, dragging in people, ideas, food, commodities and even victims for the gladiatorial shows.  Mumford says that it quickly became a parasitic relationship, with Rome - the focus of the Empire - leeching from the productive gains around its regions.  The population of Rome, the mob, were largely housed in horrific tenements up to 10 stories high, the product of profiteering land owners.  Mumford argues that as the metropolis grew, engorging itself on the feast of Empire, the conditions for many of its inhabitants worsened as the density increased.  These vast tenements blocks fermented anger, resentment and revolt periodically and the ruling elite, rather than solve the fundamental problems with social equality, better housing and genuine justice, (predictably) opted to buy the population off with bread, circus entertainment and glamourous shows of military might.

Mumford's argument is that the brutalising affects of the urban metropolis lead to a culture that revelled in seeing other's humiliation, torture and death as a distraction from their own.  While your life may be horrific, at least you're not being torn apart by lions...  It was also a visceral experience which allowed the population to experience a touch of the 'real' as a distinction from the shallow materiality of Roman existence, which glorified the body and little else.  He also likens this to today's culture - again considering he was writing in the 1970's - of searching for visceral experience in sport, violent films, porn... and the gratuitous and hypocritical exposition of people in tabloid press.  We all love to hear and read about people's humiliations and failings..."they deserve it"... why is that?

So, as with the decaying Greek cities, which increased in grandeur as their moral life collapsed, Rome glorified itself with stadia and circuses, and other incredibly dominant public buildings as the vitality and energy which had originally propelled it to expand, died away.  

Wednesday, 31 August 2011

'The City in History', Lewis Mumford - part 2, The Greeks

He leaves the walled citadel cities of Mesopotamia and the riverine open cities of Egypt behind and moves on to Greece.  Among an incredible array of references and concepts, he analyses how and why the Greek poleis of the 6th and 5th centuries were able to create such a wealth of exceptional figures, which he points out, has probably only been equalled by Renaissance Italy.

It is very difficult to summarise the analysis of the Greek poleis in such a short piece, but among the points he makes is that, as the cities grew, and the connection of the citizens to one another began to break down through sheer weight of numbers, certain reforms failed to materialise which would have allowed the society and the city to adapt.  This allowed despots and tyrants to assume power and led to the ancient predilection for monumentalism and kingships to creep back in.  Knowledge and learning shifted from active experience, face to face aggressive discussion and argument, testing of ideas through practice to theoretical development, the natural sciences and mathematics.  Classifications and technical possibility.
This meant the death of a fulsome communal life in the later Greek cities, while the appearance of the cities grew in monumental appearance and style.  Mumford basically says that the vibrant, organic hotchpotch of 6th/5th century BC Athens was the ultimate apogee of Greek culture, over the hollow moral shell (but outwardly far more advanced and impressive) of Periclean Athens.
He builds these points brilliantly and very succinctly and introduces absolutely killer comparisons to today's (writing in the 1970's) Western culture.  You can't help but agree with his images of moral wasteland but technical mastery of environment that we now live in - a society flapping beneath the surface for a firm foothold to get some direction.

The sense you get from him of the inevitability of the rise and fall of societies is genius, and the connections to how the city can shape this, and also how this shapes the city is brilliant.